My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20070402 - VIII-B-4
10.0.0.9
>
City Council
>
CC Packets
>
2000's
>
2007
>
20070402
>
20070402 - VIII-B-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2009 1:16:44 PM
Creation date
3/30/2009 1:16:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
CC Packets
Date
4/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mazch 27, 2007 VIII-B-4 <br />TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council <br />FROM: John Grossman, HRA Director <br />RE: Recommendation on Redevelopment Agreement with Sherman Associates <br />SUMMARY: The Council Planning Committee met with Loren Brueggemann of <br />Sherman Associates on March 26 to discuss the existing market and fmancial feasibility <br />of the condominium and townhouse proposals for Block 1. The committee recommended <br />that staff clarify public and private costs under the terms of the agreement, and prepare <br />language terminating the agreement for consideration by the City Council and HRA. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />The City and the HRA have pursued redevelopment of the downtown to attract and <br />support new development that: <br />• Is market feasible <br />• Is fmancially feasible <br />• Meets the community's redevelopment goals <br />In 2004 the City and HRA selected Sherman and Associates for downtown <br />redevelopment. A site and building plan and TIF district were approved. The City and <br />HRA executed a development agreement with Sherman Associates in July 2005. It <br />documents the 29-unit condominium project, and later phases on Blocks 1, 3 and 29. In <br />September 2006, Sherman determined that the condos were not market feasible and <br />proposed an alternate development of 23 town homes. On February 28, 2007 Sherman <br />concluded that they could not build the town homes at the unit prices recommended by <br />the market report, although time and a market upswing could change that. In comparison <br />to the condominium, the town homes would contribute significantly less revenue to fund <br />community goals such as park improvements or visitor destinations. <br />The development agreement states that if there has not been a closing on development <br />property by March 31, 2007, the agreement can be terminated by one party giving written <br />notice to the other. Unless specific action is taken to terminate the agreement, it remains <br />in effect. Mr. Brueggeman, Vice President of Sherman Associates, has indicated that if <br />the existing agreement is terminated they would like to discuss some form of agreement <br />to preserve their development rights. <br />COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: 1) That staffclarify public and private costs <br />under the terms of the agreement, and prepare language to terminate the agreement for <br />consideration by the City Council and HRA in May. 2) That Council and HRA take time <br />to review downtown redevelopment issues and goals, and not consider new proposals <br />during this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.