Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. Increase in sign allowance. Warg brought up the issue of sign age at the LeDuc house. <br />Chad Roberts of Dakota County Historical Society wanted a second sign facing 1 ih <br />Street. City Council amended the sign ordinance to permit a second sign on public use <br />properties that face two streets. The commission felt that more large signs take away <br />from the visual aesthetics ofthe house itself. Warg asked whether the county historical <br />society or the city has power over the signage at LeDuc. Grossman noted that the society <br />can propose signs, but the number and size must be within the City sign code and the <br />appearance must be approved by the commission. <br /> <br />c. Temporary signs at LeDuc. The number and frequency of temporary signs and banners <br />are another issue. There have been times when special event banners, sandwich board <br />signs, parking lot signs, were all in use at the same time. Goderstad felt the LeDuc is the <br />premiere historic house in Hastings and it should not look too commercial. Goderstad <br />suggested someone to join the Dakota County Historical Board in order to monitor issues <br />such as this. St. James suggested putting up a LeDuc sign across High Way 61. Behnke <br />suggested a sign on the lawn perpendicular to the road, resembling the period of the <br />LeDuc house. A sign with changeable letters for events was also an option. Grossman <br />will discuss these issues with the City Administrator, and the Planner and will remind the <br />society to submit the new sign design to the commission. <br /> <br />V. Information and Reports <br /> <br />A. Phillips presented a list and a map of houses that are considered for being designated as <br />historic. The list was divided up among commissioners; each commissioner will pick the <br />best few houses in their part of the list. Grossman clarified how to pick the best houses <br />by using the criteria of significance and integrity. Integrity is the quality of original <br />design. The unique visual character must remain intact. Commissioners will review their <br />findings at the June 20th meeting and the top few choices will be considered for a possible <br />designation project using a Preservation Grant. <br /> <br />B. Recent communications: <br />The conference committee cut out the preservation restriction out of the eminent domain <br />Bill. <br /> <br />C. Siemens inquired if the topography, such as cutting down trees, can be changed in a <br />historic district or site. Grossman will ask the city forester to look at the trees on the 3rd <br />Street hill. <br /> <br />IV. Adjournment: Warg moved and Martin seconded adjournment; motion carried. <br />