HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCMinutes-20081027City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 1 of 6
Hastings Planning Commission
October 27, 2008
Regular Meeting
7:00 p.m.
Chair Schmitt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call
1.
Commissioners Present: McInnis, Schmitt, Stevens, Zeyen
Commission Absent: Peine, Vaughan
Staff Present: Planning Director John Hinzman, Associate Planner Barker,
Public Works Director Tom Montgomery, Comprehensive Plan
Consultant Bill Weber
Approval of Minutes
2. –October 13, 2008
Motion by Commissioner Stevens to approve the October 13, 2008, meeting minutes.
Seconded by Commissioner McInnis.
Upon vote taken, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
OTHER ACTIONS
Ordinance Interpretation #2008-28 – Demolition of Homes in the OHDS.
3.
Staff report presented by Associate Planner Kari Barker.
Commissioner Zeyen stated that he felt the ordinance reflected a substantial improvement of
5% of the existing structure. Further, he stated that any home rebuilt on the site of the
demolished home would be over 5% of the building value, which triggers review by the
Planning Commission.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the request before staff was not for construction of a
new home, but rather to demolish the home and use the property as yard space for the
neighboring lot.
Chair Schmitt stated that the purpose of the ordinance was to maintain the integrity of the
district. Further, in his opinion, the demolition of a substandard home would enhance the
district. He also stated that if a home can be purchased for the purpose of a expanding a lot,
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 2 of 6
the home probably is not one of the jewels of the district. Chair Schmitt stated his opinion
would be not to have OHDS review before the Planning Commission for the demolition of a
home. However, the rebuilding of a home would require Planning Commission review due to
the 5% building value criteria being met or exceeded. Chair Schmitt stated that he did not
want any more restrictions placed on homeowners.
Commissioner Zeyen stated that staff could possibly look at moving the homes to be
demolished, similar to the home near the former Jiffy site.
th
Commissioner Stevens stated that a home on 7 Street was recently demolished due to fire.
He stated that the demolition was naturally caused and did not need review.
Planning Director Hinzman summarized the recommendation from the Planning Commission
as follows:
-Demolition of homes in the OHDS does not deter from the character of the
neighborhood
-Homes should try to be moved if possible
Planning Director Hinzman also added that the Heritage Preservation District works toward
preserving historic homes that meet the necessary criteria.
Comprehensive Plan Presentation
4.
Comprehensive Plan Consultant Bill Weber gave an overview of the Comprehensive Plan. He
explained that projected growth numbers were estimated by Metropolitan Council and used to
develop the Plan.
Weber explained the Land Use Plan map, including low, medium, and high density areas. He
explained that the Highway 55 corridor was designed for mixed use, which is both retail and
high density uses.
Weber stated that the map includes extra land to allow for market choice. He further
explained that there are not any expectations for the land pattern to be exact- rather, there is a
preference for a tighter mixture. Weber stated that the desire is to have a mixture of low,
medium, and high density throughout the City.
Weber described the green circles stood for parks. He also stated that there is a new business
park planned in the southwest corner of the City. Weber explained that the Vermillion Street
corridor follows the guidelines for the previous plan developed for the corridor.
Weber also explained that the Eastern Valley was shown in the plan as large lot, semi-rural.
He stated this was due to the access being difficult and sewer extension potentially being
expensive.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 3 of 6
Chair Stevens inquired if the projections by the Metropolitan Council are changed based on
the economy.
Weber stated that the projections are not change based on economy. Rather, they are changed
every 10 years. Therefore, in 2014 or 2015, new projections will come out from the
Metropolitan Council.
Planning Director Hinzman explained that the projected 220 units per year is roughly the
average number built over the last ten years; this factors in both the peak years and the current
slow down.
Chair Schmitt asked if there were any ramifications if the numbers were not met. Planning
Director Hinzman stated that housing projections are estimates and that construction numbers
are based on the market.
Weber explained that the Comprehensive Plan states that sidewalks should be on one side of
local streets and two sides of collector streets. He also explained that the street width is set at
32 feet.
Chair Schmitt inquired if the Metropolitan Council was discussing narrower streets. Planning
Director Hinzman stated there was some discussion regarding narrower street widths.
However, the Hastings Fire Department desired streets with a 32 foot width.
Weber explained the Street Functional Classification Plan. He explained that the area of Jacob
from Highway 55 to 46 as a long term improvement. Chair Schmitt inquired about the right-
of-way for the Jacob expansion. Planning Director Hinzman stated that the type of road has
not been determined.
Commissioner Stevens inquired about the street design. He stated that the streets in the
downtown area are straight while the newer streets are curvy.
Public Works Director Tom Montgomery stated that the purpose is to try and align or reuse
roads. He stated that the roads probably will probably not be straight shots due to speed
control. The curves will be used for aesthetics and traffic calming. However, there will
probably not be any sharp curves.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the intent of the future roads is to build them when
subdivisions come forward.
Commissioner Stevens asked if a portion of the road will be built if the parcel is in the middle
of a planned roadway. Planning Director Hinzman stated that it would vary by project. Public
Works Director Montgomery stated that roads will be built as the subdivision is built. Further,
if the current roadway can handle the increased traffic, the road may not need to be built at
that time.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 4 of 6
Weber explained the Park Plan, showing that the intent is to have a trail that loops around the
City along with a linear park along the Vermillion.
Chair Schmitt stated that there was a little confusion regarding the intent of the Riverfront. He
stated that in one area, it sounded like the intent was for a linear park while in another section
the focus appeared to be on commercial. Planning Director Hinzman stated that he agreed that
the wording was too strong on the acquisition of land.
Weber stated that the Site Design chapter will help guide developers with both words and
photos, particularly emphasizing the design of multi-family units. He added that public
lighting and attractive landscaping is part of Site Design
Chair Schmitt asked if the 2020 Parks Plan was followed. He said he doesn’t remember
adding but one park.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that since the last Comprehensive Plan, Greten Park, South
Pines Area Park, and the Wallin Addition Park were added.
Chair Schmitt asked if having the new Parks Plan would create a stronger point to require land
in lieu of money.
Planning Director Hinzman explained that parks are generally added with larger subdivisions.
He stated that though he cannot definitively answer Chair Schmitt’s question, he hopes the
plan does strengthen this position.
Chair Schmitt stated that developers need to be aware of these plans as it may change their
acquisition plans.
Weber stated that the Parks Plan does put developers on notice.
Commissioner Zeyen asked if the cash option would go toward the trail system connections.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the cash earned is generally spent in the same ward it
was garnered from.
Commissioner Stevens inquired into how the type of park needed was determined. Planning
Director Hinzman stated that there are standards for certain acreage requirements along with
the service area.
Commissioner Stevens asked if this information was in the plan. Weber confirmed it was in
the plan.
Weber explained the Implementation Chapter, stating that it proposes staff to write a yearly
report explaining how the plan was used in the previous year. The plan can be tweaked yearly
with major changes made every five years and a new comprehensive plan developed every ten
years.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 5 of 6
Chair Schmitt agreed with this, stating that the review is necessary to be consistent.
Chair Schmitt inquired into the proposed Highway 55 area regarding the recent Adult Use
Ordinance changes. Planning Director Hinzman stated that as this area is not proposed to be
zoned C-4, the City will have to monitor any land additions.
Public Works Director Tom Montgomery provided an overview of the Wastewater, Water
Supply, and Surface Water Management Plans. He stated that stronger conservation measures
would be a major focus moving forward. Montgomery explained that the DNR requirement is
75 gallons per capita per day. He further explained that lawn sprinkling kicks the City out of
this range.
Montgomery explained that one well ran only twelve days out the year. He stated that
essentially $850,000 was spent to meet the demands of water sprinkling. Montgomery
explained that the demands of water usage, without water sprinkling, can be met with two
wells along with one well in reserve.
Chair Schmitt inquired into the issue with contaminates that the City had until the standards
were raised. He also asked if one well went down, if the city could meet demands.
Montgomery explained that the City could meet demands short term, possibly by banning
water sprinkling. He also stated that the City was nowhere near the standards for the
contaminants with the requirement change.
Commissioner Stevens asked if there was a certain way the water flows to the wells.
Montgomery explained that the water pulls from the southwest. He also explained the
DWSMA- the Drinking Water Surface Management Area.
Chair Schmitt inquired if the water retention areas would be addressed in new developments.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the storm water ordinance changes would probably be
the first to be made.
Chair Schmitt inquired if the 75% lawn surface requirement would also be changed. Planning
Director Hinzman stated possibly.
Montgomery explained the eight lift stations along with the sensitivity of the Sand Coulee
area. He also explained that it is much cheaper to oversize pipes rather than come back and
redo them.
Chair Schmitt asked if the trunk lines were looked at for the densities proposed. Planning
Director Hinzman confirmed they had.
Montgomery described the storm sewer ponding basins. Chair Schmitt asked if there were
any concerns with kids playing by them. Montgomery stated there were none.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – October 27, 2008 Page 6 of 6
Commissioner Zeyen inquired into whose responsibility it is to dredge the ponds.
Montgomery stated that if the City owns the pond, the City is responsible for dredging them.
However, if they are privately owned, which is normally townhome associations, then the
associations are responsible for the dredging.
Chair Schmitt thanked Bill Weber and Tom Montgomery for coming to the meeting.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the Comprehensive Plan would be coming forward at
thth
either the November 10 or November 24 meeting. The most likely meeting would be the
thth
24 as making the deadlines for the 10 may be difficult.
Chair Schmitt inquired as to the form the meeting would take. Planning Director Hinzman
stated that there would be an abbreviated presentation followed by a question and answer
session.
Chair Schmitt asked if the Comprehensive Plan was available digitally. Planning Director
Hinzman stated it was available on the website.
Other Business
5.
Planning Director Hinzman updated the Commission past Council actions and on upcoming
items.
Adjournment
6.
Motion by Zeyento adjourn the October 27, 2008, Planning Commission meeting. Seconded
by McInnis.
Upon vote taken, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Kari Barker
Associate Planner