HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCMinutes-20061113City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 1 of 6
Hastings Planning Commission
November 13, 2006
Regular Meeting
7:00 p.m.
Chairman Twedt called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
1.Roll Call
Commissioners Present:
Peine, Truax, Twedt, Schmitt, McInnis, Hiedeman, Zeyen
Staff Present:
Planning Director John Hinzman, Associate Planner Kari Barker
2. Approve October 23, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Motion by Commissioner Truax to approve the minutes of the October 23, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting as presented, seconded by Commissioner Schmitt.
Upon vote taken, Ayes: 7, Nays 0. Motion passed.
Public Hearings
nd
3.Habitat for Humanity –
Preliminary Plat #2006-45 – Pleasant Acres 2 Addition -
North Frontage Road. Staff Report by Kari Barker.
Staff Report by Associate Planner Kari Barker.
Chair Twedt opened and closed the public hearing at 7:06.
Chairman Schmitt inquired into adding a twelfth requirement which would state that Habitat for
Humanity follows the recommendations from the National Resources and Recreation committee
in regards to the park land dedication. Commissioners agreed to the additional requirement.
Commissioner Truax inquired into the location of the truck washing station. He expressed
concern of chemicals and concrete entering the well site near the water tower. Planning Director
Hinzman stated that the truck washing station may be temporary. Commissioner Truax stated he
was concerned about contamination of drinking water. Planning Director Hinzman informed
Commissioner Truax that he would pass the concerns to the Engineering Department.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Schmitt moved and Commissioner Zeyen seconded to approve the
Preliminary Plat for Habitat for Humanitywith the following recommendations:
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 2 of 6
1.Conformance with the plans submitted with the Planning Commission staff report of
November 13, 2006.
2.Final approval of the development grading and utility plans by the City of Hastings
Engineering Consultant. The applicant shall be liable for any costs involved in consultant
review of the plans.
3.Waive the sewer interceptor fees.
4.All disturbed areas on this property shall be stabilized with rooting vegetative cover to
eliminate erosion problems.
5.The disturbed areas of the site shall be maintained to the requirements of the City’s
property maintenance ordinance.
6.Submission of an electronic copy of all plan sets (TIF, PDF, or similar format) prior to
issuance of certificate of occupancy.
7.Approval is subject to a one year Sunset Clause; if significant progress is not made
towards construction of the proposal within one year of City Council approval, the
approval is null and void.
8.As a condition of the Preliminary Plat, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity will be
responsible for the maintenance on their portion of the Dakota CDA access road. This
includes snow maintenance in the winter.
9.Parking shall be prohibited on the Dakota CDA access road.
st
10.Retaining walls and fencing must match material of Pleasant Acres 1 Addition.
11.The applicant must provide proof of access rights to the private Dakota CDA access road.
12.Habitat for Humanity shall follow the recommendations from the National Resources and
Recreation committee in regards to the park land dedication
Upon vote taken, Ayes: 7, Nays 0. Motion passed.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 3 of 6
4.City of Hastings –
City Code Amendment #2006-55 – Electronic Video Board Signage.
Staff Report by John Hinzman.
Staff Report by Planning Director John Hinzman.
Chair Twedt clarified that he would first open the public hearing and then the Commissioners
would discuss their interpretation of the Amendment.
Chair Twedt opened and closed the public hearing at 7:14.
Chair Twedt inquired about the notification for the City Code Amendment. Planning Director
Hinzman stated that notification was through the newspaper, which is standard procedure.
Commissioner Schmitt stated that the Amendment should prohibit graphic display signs from
motion as these types of signs have this capability.
Commissioner Truax stated that the Amendment should prohibit projection. Commissioner
Schmitt stated to review the definition in 10.02 yyy. Commissioner Truax stated that it was
projection was defined, but not prohibited. He stated that he did not want the projecting
capability to be used.
Commissioner Schmitt stated that the Amendment should also prohibit laser boxes.
Commissioner Truax referred to Subdivision 2B in regard to flashing signs. He stated that there
are already flashing signs and cited Walgreens as an example. He stated the Commission should
decide if the Ordinance would allow flashing or not. Further, Commissioner Truax stated the
Commission may want to consider restricting certain areas, such as the Vermillion Street
Corridor.
Commissioner Peine inquired if the architects for the Vermillion Street Corridor had any sign
ideas. Planning Director Hinzman stated that the architects had not gotten to that level of detail.
Commissioner Schmitt gave two suggestions for additions to the Sign Ordinance. First, the issue
of window signage may want to be addressed. Secondly, Commissioner Schmitt stated that the
Ordinance should address the penalties of disregarding the regulations.
Commissioner McInnis stated his concern that the signage is not harmful to neighbors or traffic.
Chair Twedt stated that he felt that only one screen should be allowed at a time. In addition, no
flashing or long messages should be allowed.
Planning Director Hinzman asked if the Planning Commission desired to see the Ordinance with
their proposed changes or if he should recommend the changes to the City Council. Chair Twedt
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 4 of 6
stated that he was agreeable to recommending the changes to the City Council. The
Commissioner was in agreement.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Schmitt moved and Commissioner Truax seconded to approve the City
Code Amendment with the aforementioned recommendations.
OTHER ACTIONS
th
5.Patrick Moseng –
Home Occupation Permit #2006-54 – Locksmith – 413 18 Street E.
Staff Report by Kari Barker.
Staff Report by Associate Planner Kari Barker.
Commissioner Truax stated that he has concerns over the Home Occupation Ordinance, not Mr.
Moseng’s business. He stated that in September, the Planning Commission voted (4-3) to
approve a Home Occupation License for a business that initially came through as a code
violation issue. The City Council approved the License (7-0) and did not address the code
violation issues. Thus, Commissioner Truax stated he feels the ordinance is invalid.
Commissioner Truax expressed his desire to have an exception clause that would allow existing
businesses to continue operation if they were in good standing. Commissioner Truax stated his
desire would be to have the City Council fix the ordinance and then approve Mr. Moseng’s
Home Occupation Permit.
Mr. Moseng asked Commissioner Truax if he was stating the ordinance was poorly written.
Commissioner Truax stated that was correct. Mr. Moseng stated he previously had a Home
Occupation Permit, but had not made the time to reapply for one.
Planning Director Hinzman inquired as to the parts of the ordinance to fix. Commissioner Truax
stated he wanted existing home occupations to continue. Planning Director Hinzman inquired if
this would be in the form of a grandfather clause. Commissioner Truax stated that it would not
be an entire grandfather clause. Rather, only those in compliance would be allowed to continue.
Commissioner Truax stated that he wants to make the rule the same for all.
Chair Twedt stated that the Commission should make a recommendation to the City Council to
review the ordinance and also Mr. Moseng’s application.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Schmitt moved and Commissioner Truax seconded to approve the City
Code Amendment with staff recommendations.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 5 of 6
Chair Twedt inquired if the applicant used solvents and key filings during the business. Mr.
Moseng stated that the filings are brass. Further, although he can recycle them, he throws them
in the trash can as they are not harmful to the environment. Mr. Moseng also stated that only
small amounts of solvents are used.
Chair Twedt stated that staff should look into disposal regulations for filings. Planning Director
Hinzman inquired how much filings are thrown each month. Mr. Moseng stated a handful of
filings were disposed of each month.
Upon vote taken, Ayes: 7, Nays 0. Motion passed with the following staff recommendations:
1.That the business be operated in compliance with the information provided by the
applicant. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department notice of changes that
expand the business (i.e. additional outside employees) to determine if the business is
operating within the confines of the code.
2.That the business will be operated in compliance with the Home Occupation regulations
as established by the Hastings City Council.
3.That the Type II license will be in a probationary status for one year. When the year is up,
the Council will review the license and determine whether it should be issued for the
remaining two years.
4.Per the request of the Fire Marshall, a minimum ten-pound fire extinguisher must be
located in the shop at all times.
The Planning Commission then discussed recommending to the City Council to review the
Home Occupation Ordinance. Commissioner Truax specifically stated to review adding a
restrictive clause that allows a long standing business in good standing to continue operating
with a license.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Truax moved and Commissioner Schmitt seconded to approve the request
to the City Council.
The motion passed unanimously.
6. Other Business
Director Hinzman updated the Commission on previous Council activities.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission Minutes – November 13, 2006 Page 6 of 6
A resident from existing Habitat for Humanity homes came forward with a letter stating concerns
of his current development. Planning Director Hinzman stated that the letter would be placed in
the packet for the November 20, 2006, City Council meeting.
7. Adjourn
Commissioner Truax motioned and Commissioner Zeyen seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Kari Barker,
Associate Planner