Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />You may be impacting a future historic neighborhood. <br />This neighborhood, especially on Whispering Lane and Crestview, are some of the best and most unique <br />homes built in Hastings in the past 20 years. The homes are all individuals and indicators of the style of <br />the decade in which they were built. This is not tract housing where they are all the same with differing <br />veneer; they were built to fit the needs and personalities of the residents. <br />In 50 years time, these homes could be examples of the best of the late 20th century. History has a <br />starting point and the neighborhood has driven its stake down in time. <br />Contrast this with the proposed apartment buildings. What kind of care and interest will these buildings <br />engender? Probably not much, perhaps they will be viewed as what was wrong with large scale <br />development. <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />Specific Objections to this Project <br /> <br />. It is ugly. <br />There is nothing of architecturiU interest in the plan. The facade is plain and uninteresting. It is <br />completely maximized and utilitarian. It screams apartment building, not home. It is nothing more than <br />a warehouse for people, a barracks. <br /> <br />It is far too large. <br />It fills the lot and will tower over the neighborhood. It is located on some of the highest land in Dakota <br />county. It will be like having the Government Center in our yards. It is out of scale to its surroundings, <br />and would be more appropriate adjacent to commercial property. <br />The current residents will have no privacy. They will be in constant view of the new buildings. This <br />effectively takes away the use of their yards unless they are exhibitionists. <br />These buildings will dominate the view from the neighborhood and will be visible from throughout the <br />city. Is this what people want to see? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Parking is inadequate. <br />I know I mentioned this before, but it bears repeating. 72 garages and 72 parking stalls won't even begin <br />to serve the residents. It will overflow into the street and be a detriment and hazard. This goes to the 2nd <br />point, this project is too big for its space. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />What about water run-off? <br />Approximately 70% of the lot is developed or paved. The water run-off will be tremendous. There is no <br />provision for capturing or draining the water except into the street. Will the sewer system be able to <br />handle this? This project is at the top of a hill, will adjacent properties be flooded? Will 4th Street be <br />flooded? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Landscaping is minimal. <br />Although the current plan shows the lot packed with trees Gust throw them in to show they're doing <br />something), it is just putting lipstick on a pig. No amount of trees or shrubbery will make the property <br />more attractive or less noticeable. From my front window I will now have a direct view of 36 <br />garage/storage units. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />There is no recreational space. <br />There is no play yard, pool, tennis courts, or even just a plain yard. A home has a place where one can <br />enjoy being outdoors. Here there is a slab of asphalt and a green space which is so full of trees as to <br />unusable for any purpose (if grass will even grow there). Are the children who live there going to play <br />in the streets (if the street isn't full of cars)? <br />