My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-02-04
10.0.0.9
>
City Council
>
CC Packets
>
2000's
>
2004
>
08-02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2013 9:12:13 AM
Creation date
1/6/2005 2:50:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />VIII-B-2 <br /> <br />Variance - 1947 Ridge Lane <br />City Council Memo - August 2, 2004 <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />Memo <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Mayor Werner and City Council <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Courtney Wiekert, Planning Intern <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />August 2, 2004 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Resolution - LeRoy Finke - Variance #2004-35 to vary from the side <br />yard setback and to enlarge a non-conforming structure to construct a <br />garage addition at 1947 Ridge Lane. <br /> <br />REQUEST <br /> <br />LeRoy Finke seeks a 6.5' variance to the 10' side yard setback requirement as well as a <br />variance to enlarge a non-conforming structure (garage) at 1947 Ridge Lane. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the variance to vary from <br />the side yard setback and to enlarge a non-conforming structure to construct a garage <br />addition at the July 12, 2004 Meeting. The Commissioners granted the variance based on <br />the following criteria: <br /> <br />1) The literal interpretation of the City Code would deprive the applicants of rights <br />commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of <br />Chapter 10. <br /> <br />2) That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from actions of the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />There was limited discussion on the construction ofthe garage. The Commissioners asked <br />if the tree was completely located in the applicant's yard or shared with the neighbor. They <br />also asked for clarification on the concern of the neighbor north to their property. Mr. Finke <br />clarified that the tree is completely in his yard and he has spoken to the neighbor and they <br />had no issues with the garage addition. <br /> <br />I <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.