My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/22/92
10.0.0.9
>
City Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990's
>
1992
>
06/22/92
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2009 12:09:47 AM
Creation date
8/19/2003 1:28:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VARIANCE - <br />1111 EAST 1ST <br />STREET - PLAN <br /> <br />The proposed parking lot, concrete curb and gutter, <br />sidewalk, fence and accessory items be completed <br />pursuant to the submitted site plan. Upon request for <br />occupancy of the building, all uncompleted items <br />contained within the site plan shall be addressed <br />pursuant to the escrow requirements contained within <br />the citys zoning ordinance (Section 10.24). <br /> <br />4. That the sidewalk shall have pedestrian ramps. <br /> <br />That a "NO PARKING" sign be placed along the south <br />side of the building. <br /> <br />Upon vote taken, Ayes, 5; Nays, 0. <br /> <br />Czech reviewed staffs June 12, 1992, memorandum to the <br />Planning Commission concerning a variance request by Terry <br />and Candace Plan for approval of a 15 foot front yard setback <br />variance for a home to be located at 1111 East First Street. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission discussed issues relating to this <br />variance request including, but not limited to, the alignment of <br />existing structures, the width of the East 1st Street right of way, <br />the possibility of vacating a portion of the East 1st Street right <br />of way so as to eliminate encroachments, and whether the <br />variance procedure is the proper way to handle the applicants <br />request to locate zero feet from the front/south property line. <br /> <br />Commissioner Batemen moved, Commissioner Featherstone <br />made a second, to approve the variance request based on the <br />following findings: <br /> <br />That the property was platted prior to the adoption of <br />the City Code. <br /> <br />First Street width was l~d out 100 feet wide for a <br />parade route many years ago and there have been no <br />parade staging, the e~stingwidth canbe considered null <br />and nonconforming. <br /> <br />With the original street layouts, houses have been in the <br />as now surveyed right of way. <br /> <br />To comply with existing setbacks, the "indent"/setback <br />would be peculiar to the normal alignment of structures. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.