Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ttASTINGS PLANNING COI~MISSION <br />MONDAY, MAY 23, 1983 <br />7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />Chairman Murphy called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Commissioners Murphy, Swanson, Stevens, <br />Reuter, Martin, Simacek, Conzemius, and <br />Wendler. <br /> <br />Members Absent: Commissioner Anderson. <br /> <br /> Cormmissioner Reuter commented that the Motion on <br />the partial street vacation did not include the vote <br />tally, which was nine ayes, and 0 nayes. The Planner <br />also indicated the vote most likely did not include the <br />statement that the Planning Commission would set the <br />Public Hearing for the June 6, 1983 Council Meeting. <br /> <br /> Moved by Cormmissioner Wendler, seconded by Commis- <br />sioner Stevens to approve the Minutes of the May 9, 1983 <br />Planning Commission Meeting, as corrected. 8 Ayes, 0 <br />Nayes. <br /> <br /> Chairman Murphy opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 <br />P.M. The Planner noted that on file were a copy of the <br />Notice of Public Hearing, Affidavit of Publication, and <br />Certificate of Mailing. Thus, the Public Hearing was <br />properly called. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tony Blatnik stated that the wrong address was <br />included on the Public Hearing Notice. He also indicated <br />that River Street has a great deal of traffic, and that <br />the duplex would add to the traffic safety factor. Ann <br />Peterson asked what the difference was between the last <br />time this was presented to the Commission and the present. <br />She indicated that she understood that the proposal met <br />all zoning requirements, but that the lot was too small <br />for the proposed use, that the proposal would have traffic <br />problems, and that the Commission should consider neighbors <br />concerns. Councilman Nesbitt indicated that there is con- <br />fusion by people as to what zoning district they are in. <br />Commissioner Swanson indicated that the issue of a side- <br />walk on River Street, and the width of the street are <br />issue that should be looked at, regardless of the outcome <br />of this matter, but that the Planning Commission was <br />obligated to review the request on how it compared with <br />their rules. Commissioner Wendler indicated that a single <br />family dwelling would have essentially the same amount of <br />traffic as the proposed two family dwelling. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL <br />USE PERMIT - TWO FAMILY <br />DWELLING IN AN R-2 <br />DISTRICT - WEST SIDE OF <br />RIVER STREET BETWEEN 5TH <br />AND 6TH STREETS - AL <br />SIEBEN <br /> <br /> <br />