My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-06-00
10.0.0.9
>
City Council
>
CC Packets
>
2000's
>
2000
>
03-06-00
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2021 3:14:15 PM
Creation date
10/8/2007 10:35:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
CC Packets
Date
3/6/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VI-9 <br /> MEMO <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br /> From: Tom Montgomery <br /> Subject: Authorize Benefits Analysis for 2000 Improvements <br /> Date: March 2,2000 <br /> Council is requested to authorize the City to contract with the appraisal firm of <br /> Bettendorf,Rohrer,Knoche and Wall to prepare a benefits analysis for typical assessments for <br /> the Roadside Park neighborhood affected by the proposed 9`h, 10`}', 11"and Forest St. <br /> improvements, for the properties abutting Todd Field for the proposed 10th St. improvements, <br /> and the east Oh & 7`h St. neighborhood for the proposed improvements of Oh&7'Streets east of <br /> Bailey Street. <br /> Proposed assessments for street and storm sewer work in the Roadside Park and 10'St. <br /> neighborhoods are quite high, with a typical assessment for a 70 ft.wide lot ranging from$3,000 <br /> to $8,000. One double lot on the corner of Forest and 11th would be facing a estimated <br /> assessment of$16,000. The 6"'&Vh St. neighborhood is also facing high estimated assessment <br /> costs of close to $11,000 when including sewer and water extensions. <br /> A booming economy,high oil prices and high raw material costs are driving up <br /> construction costs. While Community Development Block Grant funds have been set aside to <br /> offer assessment abatement,not all residents are going to meet low or moderate income limits. <br /> Additional City participation will likely be required on these projects in order to meet the <br /> benefits test-a property's value should increase by an amount equal to or greater than the <br /> assessment levied against it. The proposed benefits analysis would provide a range for typical <br /> assessments for each of the three neighborhoods that could be supported by increased property <br /> value attributable to the street and utility improvement. <br /> The estimated cost of the benefits analysis for the three neighborhoods is $10,000. This <br /> cost can be funded through the 2000 construction program. In addition, it may be time to revisit <br /> the assessment policy which was last revised about 15 years ago. The benefits analysis would <br /> provide helpful information for evaluation of assessment alternatives. <br /> The proposed benefits analysis would not be completed until late this summer. At the <br /> March 20,2000 Council meeting, Council will be asked to approve construction of the proposed <br /> 2000 projects. While assessments for these projects will not be levied until the fall of 2001, <br /> Council should recognize when considering action of these projects that additional City <br /> participation will likely be required in order to meet the benefits test. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Council is requested to authorize the City to contract with the appraisal firm of <br /> Bettendorf,Rohrer,Knoche and Wall to prepare a benefits analysis for typical assessments for <br /> the proposed 2000 Improvement Program at an estimated cost of$10,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.