Laserfiche WebLink
Minufes of {he Planning Commis sion - Open Space Committee Meeting <br />Held Monday, September 14~ 1970 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />at the last seminar for review by the Open Space Committee. He also stated <br />that all of these funds are 50% matching funds. This is to eliminate the "Santa <br />Clause" effect in allocating funds; that those communities truly interested <br />in park and open space would have the incentive to participate in at least <br />50% of the funds. However, if the project would conform to the regional <br />significance aspect, in other words would conform to the Metropolitan Council <br />plan for open space and would qualify, therefore, for Lawcon Funds; that the <br />State would then participate in 50% of the balance of City Funms, which would <br />leave the City g5% of the cost of acquisition and development. <br /> <br />He also stated that the Metropolitan Council Park Reserve Board is defunct; <br />that the bill was passed in the last hours of legislature and was ruled by the <br />Attorney General to be null and void. Therefore, present practices at all <br />lo cal units of government work through the Metropolitan Council for allocation <br />of priorities. <br /> <br />Also stated that the Park and Recreation Committee should have an operating <br />budget. It should contact ali units of government, which could assist the <br />Park Open Space Committee with formulating a program. The first item <br />would be to set up the action group. Second would be to take an inventory <br />of all the present facilities and project these present facilities into the <br />total concept plan for the municipality or area, forgetting about present <br />City boundaries so that the park systems would interact with all surrounding <br />communities and alternately with the total County plan and totally with the <br />seven County plan. Once the system is set up then the Open Spac.e Committee <br />could submit a project agreement and maintenance agreement form through <br />the Dept. oI Local and Urban Affairs and depending upon priority, these funds <br />would then be allocated on a priority basis. <br /> <br />He also stated that historical sites take no precedence in this program; that <br />there would be other funds available for reconstruction for building parks <br />around a historical site and that they would assist the committee in those <br />areas. <br /> <br />There were two plans under the Minnesota Natural Resources Act. First - <br />No. 1 I39 in which they have 2. 5 million available. The second is No. 879 in <br />which they have 4 million available, 2 million of which is used for Metro-area <br />2 million for out state areas. <br /> <br />They are proposing that ail acquisition of parks out side of the Metro-area <br />be participated in 100% of the cost; 50% coming from Federal Lawcon Funds <br />and 50% from the Minnesota Natural Resources Funds. <br /> <br />- He stated that when the Open Space Committee set up a system, they should <br /> determine what are their total responsiblities. He stated that the Committee <br /> could check with Inver Grove, Cottage Grove, West St. ]Paul, South St. Paul <br /> to determine how they have proceeded with their open space programs. He <br /> suggested that possibly the iocal businessmen, who would be willing to loan <br /> <br /> <br />