07/27/70 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Hastings Planning Commission Meeting held Monday, July 27, 1970 Page 3. The next item of discussion was the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. The procedures for approval of the Zoning Ordinance were discussed in detail. It was requested of the City Engineer by the Planning Commission Chairman that the Department of Conservation be contacted to determine what their objections were to the Corps of Engineers project plan for the Vermillion River. In regard to the Zoning Ordinance discussion, it was suggested by the Planning Commission Chairman that the City Engineer work out the necessary sketches with certain parts of the Ordinance, particularly setback requirements for a reference. (See the W. St. Paul Zoning Ordinance. ) The City Engineer distributed the map of the City Streets prepared by the City Engineer and reproduced by Mr. Fischer. The map indicated the highway classification and primary streets within the City of Hastings. It was moved by Mr. Moen, seconded by Mr. Sieckert to revise the Highway 66 - 61 intersection, install 15th Street traffic signals, turn Ramsey and Tyler Street into one-way companion streets from 3rd to 18th Street and upgrade 15th Street from Ashland to Tyler Street. It was unanimously passed. Mr. Petersen reported that the Recreation Committee had returned seven questionnaires, one of whore's was Mr. Fasbender's. He indicated that he would not have the time to serve on this committee. The next item of review was the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Petersen furnished the Planning Commission Sections 3. 9 and 7.7. 1 in regard to Utilities, and Industrial Park Development. The City Engineer is to review these sections prior to the next meeting and submit his review in writing to the Planning Commission, since the City Engineer will not be present at the next regular meeting, he will be on vacation. Mr. Sontag is to be notified of the August 4th meeting of the School Board and City Council and to review the Section regarding Industrial Park Development. There was a question as to whether Section 3.4 and Section 9. Z of the Zoning Ordinance was in conflict. It was determined that Section 3.4, the second line there should be a deletion of "at the time of" and substitute "after". Section 9. Z the second line, the word "special" should be deleted. Section 7.2.2 and 9.3.3.3, it was determined that the latter should be deleted. This will change the numbering after Section 9.3.3.3. It was determined that Section 9.4. g. 4.3 should be deleted. Section 7. 1. 1, the last line should be removed and inserted as the first line in 7.1.2.